5 Perfect Ways To Deal With People Who Are Against Cannabis

Cannabis, more and more, is becoming an accepted part of mainstream society. But as we all know, there are plenty of holdouts who are still against weed.

When people are against weed

What is it that makes some people so resistant to the idea of accepting cannabis as a normal part of life? A big part of the conflict is the miseducation that many have received, due to the anti-weed propaganda that has been so prevalent in our society for 80 years now.

How do you react when friends, family members, acquaintances, or random strangers assail cannabis culture? What’s the best, most intelligent reaction when your obnoxious Uncle Arnie goes off on his standard weed rant? Here are a few suggestions.

It’s all about the weed science

If you are of a logical and analytical frame of mind, then you can be happy that science is standing behind you on the subject of cannabis.

There are literally hundreds, maybe thousands, of good, solid scientific studies that show cannabis to be no more harmful than alcohol or tobacco, and in fact, much less dangerous by almost any objective measure.

The politics of pot: Adapt your message to your audience

If the person who’s against weed is more of a political animal than the scientific type, then it’s important to use the arguments which might work best at convincing them. For instance, if you find a liberal opposed to weed (and there are a few!), pursue the social justice angle.

If you find yourself debating a conservative, remind them that legalization is good business. What if you find a libertarian opposed to pot? Point out that Big Government has no business intruding in the personal lives of citizens and making those kinds of decisions for them.

If they say, ‘But what about weed and the children?’

Turning this old anti-legalization refrain on its head is an effective way to counter arguments that “We can’t legalize marijuana, because what about the children?” First of all, in a black market scenario, nobody asks for I.D.

Secondly, there are plenty of kids who, for medical reasons, need cannabis, and in fact, many with severe seizure disorders and other ailments are in greater danger of dying when they don’t have access to cannabis.

Medical weed is safer than pharmaceuticals

Opioid overdoses drop in states with access to marijuana (either recreational or medical). How much is one human life worth? A lot more than keeping prohibition in place, that’s for sure.

Every reason that was used, at the time, to justify prohibition has been debunked

Whether it’s the racist sensationalism of 1930s Reefer Madness or the Gateway Theory of the 1960s, every so-called justification for prohibition has been disproven, so they have to keep coming up with new (still ridiculous ones).

The old saw about teaching pigs to sing is applicable here. Don’t let them harsh your buzz!

  • if you know of any additional ways to counter, leave a comment below
LoginJoin the weed revolution. Post your cannabis content without prejudice and censorship. Create your own groups. Join our online social cannabis community, anonymously!

Check Also


Edinburgh mum who campaigned for cannabis oil for son’s seizures will hand £231k bill to UK Government

The mum of a little boy with severe epilepsy is set to bill politicians more …


Joe Biden: “Cannabis Should Remain Illegal As A Misdemeanor”

Last week, former Vice President Joe Biden said during the Democratic debate that cannabis offenses …


Synthetic Cannabis Found in CBD Products Across United States

CBD edibles and vapes spiked with a variety of synthetic marijuana compounds have found their …

One comment

  1. “What if you find a libertarian opposed to pot? Point out that Big Government has no business intruding in the personal lives of citizens and making those kinds of decisions for them.”

    No, because this Ninth-Amendment argument is two-sided. Even my father, who knows better than to push his beliefs on anybody (in true libertarian fashion), could retort that his choice to refrain from using any drugs is governed by personal liberty — and he would be correct.

    I can’t think of any reason for a libertarian to be opposed to pot, except for practical reasons (such as perceptual & professional interests, where an objective libertarian understands the need to avoid pot to get/keep a certain job).